The 4% Rule Is Too Low!
The “4% Rule” is a common retirement rule in personal finance. It’s a basic rule of thumb that suggests you can withdraw 4% from a well diversified portfolio and have a reasonably high chance of having money left over in 30-years.
Like any personal finance rule, it’s a bit of an oversimplification of a rule that contains many nuances. This rule is based on a famous study called “The Trinity Study”. That study was built on top of the work of Bill Bengen who used historical stock/bond/inflation rates to determine that a retiree can withdraw 4% of their initial portfolio value, adjusted for inflation each year, and have a reasonably high chance of success.
This is an amazing piece of work and has enabled many individuals to formulate their own retirement plans. But for Canadians it might be too low & too pessimistic.
When using the 4% rule it’s important to remember that “success” in the Trinity Study and in Bengen’s analysis means that there is at least $1 left after 30-years. It does not mean that investment principal will be left untouched. It’s very possible that a retiree could end up with just $1 in their account after 30-years and that would be considered success.
The nice thing about the 4% rule is that it’s pretty easy to find your target “retirement number”. All you have to do is estimate your annual retirement spending (including tax!) and multiplying by 25. If I wanted to retire with $50k/year before tax, according to the 4 percent rule, I would need $1,250,000 (25x $50,000/year)
The issue with the 4% withdrawal rule is that for Canadians it’s too low, it’s too pessimistic, and it leads people to forget about other types of retirement income and perhaps save too much. If you’re retiring in your 50’s to early 60’s then you could start withdrawing at a higher rate and still be successful.
(Disclaimer: Everyone’s situation is different. What works for one retiree may not work for another. Make sure to review your retirement plans with an advice-only financial planner to ensure your plan is successful)
Retirees in their 50’s or early 60’s will be eligible for two large government benefits just a few years after retirement. CPP and OAS can easily provide 25%+ of a retirees annual spending. Ignoring these benefits will mean you might save too much! Aiming for a portfolio that is 25x your annual spending is overkill because it doesn’t take into account these large government benefits.
For many retirees in their 50’s and early 60’s they can withdrawal MORE than 4% from their portfolio at the beginning of retirement. This is because a few years down the road they’ll be eligible for CPP and OAS. Once these benefits kick in their withdrawal rate will be much, much lower.
But, the earlier you retire the closer to the 4 percent withdrawal rate you need to be. Retiring early means you need to have closer to 25x your annual spending to bridge the gap between early retirement and government benefits. Bridging a 5-year gap between age 55, when retirement starts, and age 60, the earliest CPP can begin, is much different than retiring at 45 and waiting 15+ years for CPP.
Not only does retiring early create a larger gap between your retirement date and CPP/OAS but there are other risks too. One of the biggest risks is a change to OAS.
OAS is funded through government revenue. This means it’s not guaranteed the same way CPP is guaranteed. In fact, we’ve already seen OAS change twice in the last decade. OAS briefly went from age 65 to age 67 and then back again. This didn’t affect people who were already 55 but for those 55 and under they saw their earliest OAS date pushed later and later.
Still, for anyone in their early 50’s to early 60’s it’s reasonable to assume CPP and OAS will be available in its current form (but nothing is 100% guaranteed!)
Let’s look at two scenarios, one where retirement starts at age 55 and the initial withdrawal rate is above the “4% safe withdrawal rate”, and a second scenario where retirement starts at age 45 with the same withdrawal rate. For each scenario we’ll look at the success rate (how likely it is that we won’t run out of money before age 100).
Scenario 1: Couple Retiring At 55
- Investment Portfolio: $1,000,000
- Annual Pre-Tax Target Income: $50,000
- CPP at Age 60: $13,642 (2x partial CPP. Assumes 30 years of max contributions, reduced by 36% for taking CPP early at age 60)
- OAS at Age 65: $14,434 (2x full OAS)
This plan has a 100% success rate!
Projections are all in real dollars.
Scenario 2: Couple Retiring At 45
- Investment Portfolio: $1,000,000
- Annual Pre-Tax Target Income: $50,000
- CPP at Age 60: $9,095 (2x partial CPP. Assumes 20 years of max contributions, reduced by 36% for taking CPP early at age 60)
- OAS at Age 65: $14,434 (2x full OAS)
This plan only has a 68% success rate, definitely not a secure retirement plan. In this situation the couple would need to work a little longer to increase the size of their portfolio and get their withdrawal rate closer to 4%.
Projections are all in real dollars.
The 4% Rule Is Too Low!
For the retirees in scenario 1 who retired at 55 with $1M and started by withdrawing $50,000 per year the 4% rule would be too low, too pessimistic for their situation. Following the 4% rule would have meant they needed to save an additional $250,000 before retiring.
However, retiring 10-years earlier means that our higher withdrawal rate leads to failure in 36% of historical scenarios. This failure rate is too high to be considered a secure retirement plan. In this case they would need to save more and aim for withdrawals closer to the 4% rule.
Disclaimer: Every situation is different and we recommend speaking with an advice-only financial planner to solidify your retirement plans. In both cases above we looked at CPP and OAS but a defined benefit pension is another big factor that needs to be considered when estimating safe withdrawal rates. In both these cases we also assumed a low-cost ETF portfolio, higher annual investment fees will decrease the success rate even further.
Join over 250,000 people reading PlanEasy.ca each year. New blog posts weekly!
Tax planning, benefit optimization, budgeting, family planning, retirement planning and more...
Join over 250,000 people reading PlanEasy.ca each year. New blog posts weekly!
Tax planning, benefit optimization, budgeting, family planning, retirement planning and more...
Hi Owen,
Just discovered your blog and I love it. Thank you for posting such great insightful posts.
I am 44 and wife is 39. Our current costs are around 65K per year. We have two kids and hopefully within 10 years our costs will be going down with them being more independent. . If I multiply the 65K X 25, that would be 1.6M if we retired today and that does not include taxes. If we pay another 5K in taxes, that means we will need around 1.75M. We will have to work at least another five years to get there. If I use 5% that will be 1.4M which we could get there in a couple of years. Do you think 5% is too aggressive if we retire in the next couple of years even though our costs should go down by about 20% when the kids are independant and factoring CPP&OAS?
Thank you so much
Hi Kevin, thanks for your comment!
It’s hard to say for your exact situation without actually running the numbers. The factors you’ll need to consider include how much you can expect from CPP, retiring earlier will decrease this amount, also how certain we can be about OAS being around in the future, and what those extra years of early retirement mean for your draw down, especially during bad investment years etc etc.
Retiring at 55 is very different than retiring at 50 or 45. Those extra 5-10 years add a lot of risk. How much risk exactly depends on your specific plan/goals/spending/income/benefits etc.
I definitely think you’re on the right path, you’re in excellent shape, but the exact year you can target for retirement will require a bit more of an in-depth look at your finances.